They built an mausoleum for his family and placed it next to the mosque “Spiritual”.
.
Au parlement de la république Française.
De la présidence du soviet suprême TSSR mais les partis aussi d”opposition au régime du Saparmourad Niyazov , président du turkmenistan .
L”appel.
Nous nous adressons à vous comme vers l”institut démocratique avec la demande! Du fait que le régime criminel du Saparmourad Niyazov a fait une série de crimes contre le peuple turkmene, mais aussi contre la culture mondiale et les valeurs humaines. Nous vous demandons de éclaircir certains questions lié avec la compagniefrançaise de
la construction “Bouygues” mais aussi des subdivisions de la société
travaillant sur le territoire du turkmenistan.
1. Comme aux oppositions et comme aux citoyens turkmenes ce fait pour nous est profondement désagréable qu”en juin - juillet 2003 à la tenue des travaux de construction, dans le village ”Kipchak” à la construction de la mosquée ”L”esprit” , sont découverts et supprimée les tombeaux des plus anciens turkmenes ,mais aussi les valeurs archéologiques. La gestion du chantier a passé sous silence les faits des trouvailles , dans l”acte donneé nous trouvons le crime contre la culture mondiale.
2. Nous vous demandons de comprendre en matière du pot-de-vin réel présenté de la part de la société française “Bouygues” au S.A. Niyazov. À savoir, nous établissons le fait, que le mausolée de la famille Niyazov à côté de la mosquée ”L”esprit” a Kipchak est le cadeau de la société ”Bouygues” au président fonctionnant
turkmene! Nous trouvons que c”est violation des lois du Turkmenistan ainsi que les normes du droit international.
Respectueusement à vous comme aux représentants du peuple de la France , modèle du l”état démocratique.
Fait á:
La:
La signature:
“Acting Chairman of the Supreme Soviet Presidium of the
Republic of Turkmenistan”
K. Soinov
This is a list of reliable sources
-Minutes from the Turkmenian archaeologist amateur section. Tashkent year 1908
-Information from the newspaper Neutral Turkmenistan, writer Aidogdy Kurbanov.
- American professor Pampelli.
Explorations in Turkestan. Prehistoric Civilizations of Anau, Washington 1908.
-Global Witness
http://www.globalwitness.org./reports/show.php/en.00088.html
-DER SPIEGEL (17/2006) - 24.04.2006
ENERGIE : Werben um Turkmenbaschi
-TURKMENISTAN PROJECT.
http://www.eurasianet.org/turkmenistan.project/index.php?page=wnb/editor/wnb20060505&lang=eng
The document is prepared by committee on foreign affairs Highest Advice of Republic Turkmenistan
Reference
The Turkmen opposition in exile considers the self-proclaimed Turkmen President for life Niyazov illegitimate, based on the breaches of law during his first election and rigged re-elections that followed. Since holding free elections in Turkmenistan for the time being remains impossible, this could mean the lack of any legitimate power. Yet the Turkmen opposition in exile has analysed the history of 1989- 1990ies and came to the conclusion that de jure the Supreme Council of the Soviet Republic of Turkmenistan has never been dissolved.
De facto the working of the Supreme Council has been terminated by the illegitimate actions of Niyazov in May 1992. However, the Chairman of the Supreme Council has not ratified the Constitution on the basis of which Niyazov is claiming his authority, as it was foreseen by the law at that time, respectively, Niyazov” s Constitution legally has never entered in force.
The Supreme Court has never taken a decision about own dissolution, which was the legitimate way to the new elections foreseen by the law in force at that time.
According to the Constitution of 1989- 1990, which is de jure still in force in Turkmenistan, the Chairing Committee of the Supreme Council holds its authority until the newly elected Supreme Council of Turkmenistan takes over.
According to the details mentioned above and the number of other legal arguments, the Chairing Committee of the Supreme Council of Turkmenistan considers itself to be the only legitimate government of Turkmenistan at this time and continues its workings in exile until there will be a possibility to form a caretaker government in the country and call for the new elections.
Obviously, the goal is not to restore the Soviet Republic of Turkmenistan as such, but to preserve the legitimate government, elected in the brief moment when Gorbachev”s reforms allowed for free elections. The ultimate goal would be to smooth the transition from the inevitable breakdown of Niyazov”s regime to the new free elections by the existence of caretaker government, elected by the people of Turkmenistan and thus enjoying respective legitimacy.
